Hughes Brothers #4 – From Hell

03/07/2012

The Story

It’s 1888 and someone is murdering prostitutes in the London district of Whitechapel, someone whose prolific and gratuitous knifework earns him the nickname Jack the Ripper. The eccentric Detective Abberline (Johnny Depp) heads the investigation and slowly uncovers a startling conspiracy that links the murders to shadowy Masonic rituals, cultic sacrifice, and the fate of the English crown. Meanwhile, Abberline befriends one of the Ripper’s intended victims (Heather Graham), but as the case drags on, comes to realize that it may take more than solving the case to save her life.

The Production

There are so many Jack the Ripper stories out there, you guys. Like that one video game where he fights Sherlock Holmes? Or that time he turns up in Babylon 5 as an alien space inquisitor? He gets around! But few attempts at the story have been quite as audacious and far-reaching as Alan Moore’s From Hell, an exhaustive 600-page monolith of a graphic novel that uses a widely-discredited conspiracy theory as a diving board into a pool of heady ideas on spirituality and culture, among many, many other things. Basically, From Hell is about everything there is in the world.

“I, uh… I flipped through it.”

This obviously presented a challenge for producer Don Murphy (Apt Pupil) who optioned the novel alongside fellow future squandered-opportunity League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Seeking to trim the narrative down to something movie-sized, Murphy found willing partners in Albert & Allen Hughes, whose own interest in the Ripper legends began as children watching a scary documentary on TV. With the Hughes Brothers came Johnny Depp, then still a few years from his international superstardom. Depp, thanks to his longtime collaboration with Tim Burton, seemed a natural fit for such a dark, gothic story, and the actor expressed interest in the project directly to the Brothers while meeting about another. It was a slam dunk to cast him as Abberline.

Less of a slam dunk was budget-friendly Prague where the production had committed to shoot. Unable to find locations that matched the Whitechapel district, the production had to build several complete city blocks on a soundstage, but while that construction wore on, the script was in a state of demolition. Two writers—Terry Hayes (Dead Calm) and Rafael Yglesias (Fearless)—each took a pass at paring Moore’s novel down, carving away with their pens and plucking out various unsavory tidbits like so many misplaced kidneys, entrails, and other Ripper metaphors, eventually draining Moore’s ocean of ideas down to a straightforward murder mystery (a major change, since the identity of the killer is known very early in the novel, and much of the story is told from his perspective.)

Alongside these cuts were two big additions. The first was Abberline’s psychic abilities—added, the Hughes Brothers claimed, to help make Abberline a more interesting lead. The second was a happy ending that leaves one of the Ripper’s real-life victims alive and well at the end of the story.

Absinthe: The fresher, cleaner, hallucinogenic way to wash up after a murder.

Released just a month after 9/11, From Hell failed domestically, not quite recouping its $35 million budget, likely due to a combination of a national distaste for violence in the wake of that tragedy and rumors that the film narrowly avoided a rare NC-17 for gore. The film fared better overseas and, now distanced from that unfortunate release date, found a healthy life on home video.

What Works Like Crazy

I’ll say this, the Hughes Brothers were certainly an inspired choice to get From Hell up on the screen. “The Menace II Society guys are doing a British true-crime horror story?” you might ask as so many did, but From Hell fit quite comfortably into the Hughes’s early target zone. Like Menace and Dead Presidents, From Hell is a story about class and violence in an oppressive urban environment. London in 1888 wasn’t South Central Los Angeles but it was deeply divided, hacked in two and shared by the wealthy upper class and a poor workforce simply fighting to exist. Forget paying bills; many Whitechapel residents wondered whether they could find a scrap to eat or a place to sleep not infested with crap, a reality largely created, encouraged, and maintained by the ruling class. That one of the wealthy elite might have descended into Whitechapel to literally hunt and carve up its residents for sport caught the public’s imagination partly because it appeared to be a cruel, even inevitable, result of that system. Life is cheap, but how cheap, exactly?

Recognizing the territory, the Hughes Brothers got the details right. The film is thick with moments and scenes that give Whitechapel—although clearly a soundstage—a real sense of living and breathing and struggling. Murder scenes are recreated exactly as they were found during the Ripper case and the shots are littered with little observations that speak to the difficulty of life in the Victorian era.

Freed from location shooting and the need for realism found in their earlier projects, the Brothers splattered the production with the kind of dreamy, gothic touches that had threatened to burst through in their earlier films. From Hell is all stark angles and filthy cobblestones and explosions of bright red color across gray-black stone. The style creates a nightmare London two stops over from Tim Burton’s Gotham City.

What Disappoints

Unfortunately for Johnny Depp, this ain’t a Tim Burton film. Depp’s collaborations with Burton usually sprang from very smart, serviceable scripts, but From Hell leaves Depp to fend for himself in the face of some really baffling choices.

The Hughes Brothers were staring down the barrel of a massive source novel, and they responded by gutting it. Look, I get that. I support radical adaptations—I have to if I want to enjoy, say, Jaws—but the changes in From Hell altered the material dramatically, and created a slew of new problems that were then immediately mishandled.

See, in this scenario, the girl is the novel.

To change the story from a sprawling exploration of the case to a whodunit procedural, the brothers had to shove the novel’s most interesting character—the killer—behind the curtain. OK, fair enough, but unfortunately that leaves the less-interesting Abberline to hog the stage, and instead of layering him with the complexity or detail he deserves as an actual living person who witnessed these events, they changed him into an opium-smoking psychic. They actually grafted superpowers onto a historical person. This is the cinema equivalent of taping Skeletor’s sword to your GI Joe—it’s all surface and it doesn’t fit anyway. (And incidentally, Cobra will just escalate and recruit Battle Cat.)

That surface approach to storytelling reappears throughout the movie. Abberline’s Scotland Yard sidekick Godley (Robbie Coltrane) quotes Shakespeare as his clumsy, artificial “quirk.” The would-be victims are basically one-word adjectives; there’s the grouchy one, the saintly one, the lesbian, and so on. If the movie can’t give the story the depth it deserves, then by God, nobody gets any!

“I read the ending. Peace.”

All of this would be forgiven if the procedural paid off, but it totally doesn’t. In reality, the Ripper case was a fascinating study of the crossroads where modern forensic techniques clashed with archaic human prejudice, but that isn’t present in the film. Depp’s Detective Abberline more or less abandons real forensics and goes with his instincts. He could be the star of a show called Victorian Dream Cop. Abberline follows his gut and his visions to reveal the killer whose identity the audience guessed an hour earlier simply by playing “spot the movie star.” Spoiler Alert: If a major name is playing a bit part, there’s probably a payoff in the third act.

Overall

I disliked From Hell the first time I saw it, and the intervening years haven’t change my mind. When people use the old insult “all style, no substance,” this is the kind of film they’re talking about. The natural intrigue and real-life drama that accompanied the Ripper investigation is dumped out the back window to cram in more style and gore and mood. What’s worse, the film is riddled with bits borrowed from the novel or left over from previous script drafts that make no sense on their own. (Example: when the killer is revealed near the end, his eyes turn solid black, like a shark’s. A nod to the supernatural stuff jettisoned in the adaptation process? Who knows!)

The screenwriter’s toolbox.

Still, From Hell represents a remarkable step forward in the Hughes Brothers transformation from indie auteurs to genre stylists. It’s a very attractive film, if you find eviscerations and buckets of gore to be your kind of thing. The Whitechapel sets created for the film are moody and grim and make up for some of the story’s shortcomings. Some.

With From Hell, the Hughes Brothers altered their style of filmmaking, but it felt more like a natural evolution than an abrupt change–a step forward rather than a step sideways. Johnny Depp was reportedly impressed enough with the brothers that he offered them two of his most recent mega-budget projects, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End and The Lone Ranger, although they were forced to decline. Even to this day, and even in spite of the film’s box office and critical disappointment, From Hell remains a calling card for the Hughes Brothers, but for me the film amounts to little more than a stab and a scream in the dark.

The Hughes Brothers Project

3. ???

4. From Hell

5. Dead Presidents


‘The Ward’ Pissed Me Off (And It’s Not What You Think)

03/02/2012

One of these days, I’m going to have to write a John Carpenter Project.

As a movie nerd, I’m in love with Carpenter’s work by definition. Halloween would be enough, but the man also made a movie about a bottle of green slime that can animate the dead and possess Alice Cooper through advanced mathematics.

And he nailed it.

But if you’re reading this, you know that it’ll take me a while to get to the eventual John Carpenter Project because my schedule is booked with all of the cocaine parties and supermodel orgies that come with being an unpaid movie blogger with over 30 Twitter followers.

So, instead, I’m going to talk about The Ward now.

I’ve only now gotten around to seeing Carpenter’s first feature since 2001’s Ghosts of Mars, partly because it didn’t come through theaters in my area and I wanted to make sure I’d see it in the right conditions to really examine it. I wasn’t going to screen the film on my phone or some other bullshit because, if nothing else, Carpenter has earned my undivided attention.

I also probably waited longer than I should to see the film because, frankly, everybody whose opinion I respect agreed that it sucked. And the only thing that could possibly kill the buzz of a new John Carpenter horror film is finding out that the old John Carpenter is gone.

So I was nervous when I cued it up and I got the Jagermeister ready in case it turned out to be a poop fest, but then I discovered something kinda infuriating:

The Ward is a proper John Carpenter movie.

OK, it’s definitely not the best John Carpenter movie. It’s got a really thin, derivative script built around a plot that’s already been scooped by two other films, one from 2003 and the other from 2010 (I’ll leave those of you who’ve seen The Ward to guess which movies I’m referencing.)

So, yeah, it’s not good, but it’s nowhere near Carpenter’s worst film, either. In fact, I’d say that it’s probably his best feature film since 1994’s In the Mouth of Madness.

(I’m specifically talking about features here, because his Masters of Horror entry “Cigarette Burns” is pretty damn great.)

The filmmaking in The Ward is good-to-great. Carpenter uses light, fog, and shadow like the old master that he is, dragging out a legitimate, earned sense of terror that distracted me from that growing sense in the back of my mind that I knew where this movie was going, and that the destination was dumb.

But what really set me to typing here is that The Ward is a return to a classic type of horror filmmaking that’s long since vanished from studio-funded pictures. The film has all of its fanboy hot buttons covered:

  • The movie relies on genuine atmosphere and actual tension rather than a string of false jump scares. (There are jump scares, to be sure, but the movie doesn’t lean on them and it’s never revealed to be somebody’s fucking cat or something. When you jump, it’s usually because the monster just showed up and made you jump.)
  • The movie rates a near-zero on computer graphics. Nothing kills horror like digital blood or CGI ghost effects, and Carpenter knows that. The Ward relies almost entirely on practical makeup and gore.
  • In particular, the antagonist monster is very nicely realized, completely in-camera, and with makeup that calls back to Carpenter’s best work. The critter would have fit right in to the final act of Prince of Darkness.
  • The actors mostly deliver legitimate, strong performances, especially Jared Harris, Amber Heard, and Dan Anderson. No easy task considering the flimsy state of the material.
  • There’s no choppy editing or music video style-farts. It’s just a simple horror story told with clean, classic filmmaking. It’s not too flat. It’s not overdone.
  • The script may be ridiculously derivative and predictable, but it’s still an original story, not a remake.

The Ward is not a great horror movie, but it’s exactly the type of horror movie that we’ve begged to see and which the studios never make because they believe “old-school” horror can’t find support.

And we proved them right.

If Carpenter has a history of taking C-material and turning it into a B+, well then The Ward is D material and he turned it into a C+. We owed him a nice round of applause for returning to form and for still being the John Carpenter we recognized.

(And just in case someone wants to make the case that we would have been there for the film had it been better, let me remind you that The Wolfman and A Nightmare on Elm Street both hit theaters in 2010 and both received way, way more people despite being exactly the same kind of hyper-stylized remake crap we’re supposed to hate. Which one did you pay to see in theaters that year, Nightmare or The Ward? I’m not proud of my answer.)

But instead we (and again, I’m including myself) didn’t support The Ward and it died a quiet death, secretly turning the screw one more twist toward the death of classical horror filmmaking. Once again, we begged for a certain type of movie, and then pushed our plate away when it was served to us.

If The Ward is our last John Carpenter feature film, it’ll be a damn shame. And it’ll be our fault.


The Last Least-Favorite List of 2011

03/01/2012

 

Don’t ask me why, but this was the first Oscar season in years that never held my interest. I didn’t print a ballot or try to outguess Ebert. If my body used Oscar passion instead of calories, I wouldn’t have been able to muster enough for one dismissive wave. What I’m saying is “YAWN.”

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mean any of that in some kind of Tim Gunn bitchy way because what I really want to see is some more “edge” in the Oscar broadcast, whatever that means. On the contrary, I found Billy Crystal’s return to be comforting and nice, chicken soup in a tux. Which is exactly why I thought he got the job? Right?

In truth, I’ve slowly lost interest in the Oscars for years as anything more than context. I still believe the Oscars matter, but not because they’re any kind of real barometer of quality, but rather because success at the Oscars breeds often has a profound impact on the course of careers. Ask Kathryn Bigelow—suddenly a prestige director after years of genre work—if she thinks the Oscars are more than just a peacock show.

In any case, rather than get my Least- and Most-Favorite lists out before the Oscars, as I typically try to do, I’m going to be totally anticlimactic and publish post-show. And I’m going to start with the worst movies I saw in 2011, because why not? The Razzies can suck it.

(Actually, seriously, the Razzies can suck it. But that’s another rant entirely.)

So, here we are, my least favorite movies of 2011 (that I saw, of course. I didn’t go out of my way to see crappy movies for the most part, and so there might have been way, way worse movies out there. Like Creature, or something. But this is what I saw, and so this is what you get.)

5. Green Lantern

This one hurts. I never collected comics, but I was a geeky male child in America, so I think it’s safe to say I know the territory. My favorites were Hulk, Green Arrow, and Green Lantern.  Yes, all green. No, I don’t know what that means. Nor do I know why, in this era of major budget, serious-minded superhero cinema feasts, all of my favorites have been stuck at the sloppy table with the cold fried-chicken bucket and that greeny-yellow casserole that may or may not contain broccoli.

(Oh my god, Hulk had Ang Lee! How do you fuck up Hulk and Ang Lee!?)

Green Lantern is what a superhero movie’s worst-case scenario looks like. The finished product couldn’t do more damage to the title character if it had been shot on yellow film. Everyone involved had high hopes, I’m sure. They had a star ready to break out, a director known for launching successful franchises, and a commitment to the source material that defied studio wisdom and also, kinda, common sense. Honestly, they kept the buggy-headed aliens and pink villains and everything.

Unfortunately, they didn’t have a script. Well, I mean, they did, but it was packed full of the worst kinds of studio note sloppiness, a committee-crafted beast of a screenplay that they would never think to put in front of a—oh, we’re going with this one? Release date coming up? I see.

There’s an entire wing of screenwriter hell reserved for scripts that lean too hard on the ol’ “hero must first refuse the call” thing, and even the guys in charge of that place put down their whips and shared a quiet moment of somber reflection when they saw Green Lantern. The entire movie is built around Hal Jordan not wanting to do anything. Seriously, that’s the movie. Hal is reckless and carefree, but when given unlimited power in a sweet finger accessory, he suddenly clams up and mopes around in slippers, watches TV, and probably starts thinking about growing a homeless beard. And even that blinking dead end of a movie is supported with atrocious dialogue and enormous plot holes and confusing character motivation. Green Lantern’s script was so bad that it actually ruined entirely different movies in the future, preemptively wrecking the plot of what should have been Green Lantern 2 with a boneheaded post-credits stinger that speeds through a huge, sweeping character arc in about 8 seconds.

So, yeah. Green Lantern traveled back in time from the future to kill Green Lantern 2. It’s not good.

4. Battle: Los Angeles

I’m not stupid. I’ve been at the rodeo a time or two before. I know that when I see a big budget action movie starring a second-tier leading man in the first three months of the year, well, I shouldn’t expect perfection. But, man! Battle: Los Angeles bummed me right the fuck out.

It’s hard to remember now, but there was actually a lot of positive buzz around this movie prior to release, all based on a really sweet set of trailers that promised the broad strokes of an alien invasion from the point of view of the ground troops, a perspective hinted at but never delivered in bigger, better sci-fi films like Independence Day or Spielberg’s War of the Worlds.

And I guess we got that, kind of. But instead of Blackhawk Down with aliens, the result was a disconnected soup of bad war movie archetypes killing and being killed by a horde of alien invasion movie archetypes who lacked even the ability to evoke any kind of true terror or wonder or atmosphere of any kind. The best invasion movies succeed by creating a sense of awe and overwhelming odds. The best parts of Independence Day are all the pre-battle stuff, back when the world is still trying to figure out what the flying saucers are doing and what they want. Battle: Los Angeles can’t even muster enough interest in its own bad guys to give the heroes a moment of pause. Seriously, right as the invasion begins, there’s a moment where aliens come marching out of the sea and open fire on a beach and the soldiers watching on TV just kind of shrug and start putting on their gear, like this isn’t a momentous, world-changing affirmation that there’s a bigger universe out there and it hates us, but instead “shit, I had Clipper tickets tonight.”

Battle: Los Angeles is an uninspired, thin exercise in special effects that, paired with the similarly ill-fated Skyline, proves once again for like the millionth time that it takes more than a really kick-ass team on Avid to make a movie work.

3. Season of the Witch

Season of the Witch made a late surge on this list when I picked it up on Redbox last month, despite over a year of toxic reviews in its pouch. I couldn’t help myself. For me, Nicolas Cage is like that ex-girlfriend that everybody else says is full of crap and unfaithful, but all I can think about is that one time we were at that cabin in Vermont and we arranged the ramen on a dinner plate just so until it looked like a gourmet meal and then we laughed and cuddled and talked all night. We had some really great times!

No matter how much the internet assures me that Nicolas Cage doesn’t care anymore, I just KNOW that there’s still a spark left between us. There’s Moonstruck and Face/Off and Adaptation, and so what if he made Next? Didn’t he just give me Bad Lieutenant? Don’t I owe him at least one more chance? His moose-shit insanity is mostly misunderstood. He gives everything he has to every performance. Cage can elevate really terrible material into watchability and, when paired with the right director, Cage can knock homers all day to the deepest part of the park.

But then, of course, I just get burned again by this wretched waste of time. I mean, I suppose it’s not a complete wash. I’m glad the caterers got paid. But holy crap, everything else. The saddest part is that there’s probably a good movie in the premise of two Crusaders escorting an accused witch across a countryside ravaged with the Black Plague. The concept is plump with potential directions and questions about faith, medicine, morality, and duty. Spoiled for choice, the story instead farts off in a completely new direction, the way of bad CGI demons and no ambiguity, forcing Cage and co-victim Ron Perlman to act their way through a sloppy, muddy mess in which gross-out makeup and green screens substitute for actual horror, tension, or suspense.

Worst of all, Cage seems to be listening to his critics and turns in a dull, typical leading man performance. Shut up, internet! Stop trying to change him! Just let him be happy!

2. Unknown

I thought up a game to make this inert, nonsensical little spy thriller more entertaining to sit through. The premise involves Liam Neeson waking up in the hospital after an accident and then wandering around a Europe where nobody, not even his wife, knows who he is. Worse yet, there’s a fat Aidan Quinn walking around with his name and job! It sucks, so if you decide to watch Unknown, forget that it’s a fictional movie and try to imagine instead that it’s about a documentary crew following a pissed-off Liam Neeson onto a movie set after he fails to get the part he auditioned for. Instead of accepting that he lost a role to Aidan Quinn, Liam Neeson don’t take no for an answer!

Liam Neeson: I’m Dr. Martin Harris!

A confused-looking Aidan Quinn: Uh, no, I’m Dr. Martin Harris.

Liam Neeson: That’s my wife, because I’m Martin Harris.

January Jones: Uh, no [implied ‘Liam’] you’re not.

Liam Neeson: …

Aidan Quinn: …

January Jones: …

Liam Neeson: I am!

/security

This game requires believing that Aidan Quinn can ninja fight, although Neeson is still better because, of course, at 6’9” or whatever, Neeson always has the high ground [implied ‘Anakin’.]

If you don’t take my advice and insist on viewing Unknown as an actual movie movie, you’ll find a lot of dead end clichés and spy tropes that baked up badly at the screenplay stage, like a flopped-over souffle that was only served to actual paying customers because, hey, Neeson was pretty great in Taken and this kind of looks like Taken if you squint a little bit, only except for his daughter going missing, it’s one of the important lobes in his brain.

About the only person who came out clean in this mess is Bruno Ganz as a retired spymaster drawn into the plot’s nonsense. Spoiler: he checks out on purpose rather than face another act of this shit.

1. Passion Play

I don’t like to hate on passion projects. I have a few myself, and they’ve rarely worked out as I saw them in my mind. Filmmaking is really, really hard, and no matter how much you know or think you know about what makes a good movie, it can still swallow you whole, and that sad process is even sadder when the project in question has occupied a person’s life for as long as Passion Play occupied talented writer/producer Mitch Glazer. Consumed with conviction that his story about a trumpet player who steals an angel from a desert carnival before losing her to a maudlin gangster is one that America couldn’t live without, Glazer even cast de-emoting palooka Mickey Rourke as his star.

Unfortunately, Glazer’s film is disappointingly dense and lathered in self-importance, with the kind of insight into angelic beings typically found in a portfolio on Deviant Art. The movie is so sincere that it blows past too-sincere, over the valley of aggressively sincere, and right into weaponized sincerity. As nicely dramatic and delicate and artistically the movie played in Glazer’s head, the actual footage has all the lightness of an anvil.

It doesn’t help that the aforementioned Rourke is unmistakably bored. He simply hits his marks, making sure he gets the blocking right and not much else. (After the movie was finished, Rourke torched it in the press, adding to the suspicion that he may have checked out on set.)

That’s the real problem with the film. Rourke doesn’t care enough to convince as a leading man. Bill Murray, as the gangster, doesn’t care enough to make his character fun to watch. Megan Fox, as the angel, has no sex appeal or allure. The only person who seemed to care about Passion Play is Glazer himself. He couldn’t transfer his love of the project to anyone else. The movie just flat doesn’t work, and knowing how much Glazer cared doesn’t make panning it any easier. The movie even takes the fun out of tearing it down.

Next: The Last Most-Favorite List of 2011, then back to the Hughes Brothers.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.